|





For information on the European Conference on Knowledge Management, click here
For information on the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, click here
Downloadable documents on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader (free download here)
| |
|
The Ambiguous Relationship of Leadership and Intellectual
Capital: Understanding how Intellectual Capital is Developed (pp 35-44)
Claudia Müller and Margit Raich
University of Innsbruck, Austria
claudia.mueller@uibk.ac.at ,
margit.raich@uibk.ac.at
|

 |
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Intellectual Management deals with these interactions
between all resources, tangible and intangible to create maximum value.
Leadership plays an important role when turning knowledge within an
organization into Intellectual Capital. Therefore it is of major interest
to consider and evaluate the relationship as well as possible synergies
between Intellectual Capital and Leadership to improve organizational
processes and performance.
The context of Leadership is diverse and expressed in organizational
dynamics like culture, working groups, processes, structures, products and
services etc. Being part of Intellectual Capital itself Leadership is an
important factor for the future competitiveness of an organization. To
explain a company's continued success it seems useful to examine the
influence of Leadership on other parts of the Intellectual Capital. This
process must be deemed gently because of the complexity of relations,
causes and effect.
This article aims at showing the importance of Leadership in the
development and establishment of Intellectual Capital. Special emphasis is
laid on Leadership's influence on other intangible assets an enterprise
owns and on the special relationship between Leadership and those other
part of Intellectual Capital. A case study is presented in which the GABEK
method was used to visualize these interactions. Based on the results of
the case the current state of art to measure leadership within the
existing IC- methodologies is evaluated and implications for further
research are given.
Keywords: Knowledge, Intellectual Management, Leadership,
Organizational Processes, Measurement
|
|
|