ISSN 1479-4411

First published
in 2003


Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management

   

Papers in Current Issue
   

Home Papers in Current Issue Previous Issues Site Map

    .

Home
About the Journal
Scope
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Call for Papers

 

For information on the European Conference on Knowledge Management, click here

For information on the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, click here

Downloadable documents on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader (free download here)

Volume 5 Issue 4
Barcelona 2007

Knowledge Maps and Mathematical Modelling
Tomas Subrt and Helena Brozova
University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

The aim of our paper is to explain a mathematical model as a special case of symbolic knowledge map. Each knowledge mapping is a visualization of knowledge for the purpose of its eliciting, sharing and expanding. Each knowledge map, as a special type of reality model simplifies the visualisation of reality.

Similarly to the typology of models based on the model form, knowledge maps can be divided into two main groups: (I) Analogical maps, where the analogy between real objects and symbols, plus their spatial relationships and behaviour are crucial for the map understanding and (II) Symbolic maps emphasizing the meaning of symbols, usually mathematical or verbal. This kind of map generally doesn’t insist on the symbol position. Elements of these maps are rather abstract (terms, expressions) and relations between them are expressed using mathematical formulas or verbal sentences or phrases.

Another typology of knowledge map is based on the character of judgment or solution of the (successfully) solved problem: (I) Descriptive maps describe or simulate the real situation as precisely as possible. Weak descriptive maps describe the real situations using different kinds of symbols and arcs connecting them. Graph theory models are typical tools for building this kind of map. Not only objects, but symbols and texts are important for strong descriptive knowledge maps. It includes more than text, such as symbols, legends and other visual objects. Thus to be a strong descriptive knowledge map the item must use spatial relationships to elicit, share and codify knowledge. (II) Normative maps, relating to a typical standard or norm, to optimal solution, or to the best decision. Like the normative operations research models, the normative knowledge maps show the normative solution, or help to find the best, desirable or advisable solution.

Keywords: knowledge map, knowledge map categorization, mathematical model, model construction, algorithm, model solution

Download FULL PAPER

Back to Contents

Home Up Previous Issues Site Map

EJKM is published by Academic Conferences International Limited
Curtis Farm, Kidmore End, Nr Reading RG4 9AY, England
Tel: +44 (0)1189 724148, Fax: +44 (0)1189 724691, Email: info@ejkm.com

Send mail to info@academic-conferences.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management
Last modified: January 25, 2006
ISSN 1479-4411