The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management aims to publish perspectives on topics relevant to the study, implementation and management of knowledge management
Click here to see other Scholarly Electronic Journals published by API
For a range of research text books on this and complimentary topics visit the Academic Bookshop

Information about the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM) is available here.

For info on the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM), click here
Information about the European Conference on Intellectual Capital (ECIC) is available here
To join the EJKM review committee click here
 
Journal Issue
Volume 7 Issue 3 / Jun 2009  pp297‑397

Editor: Dan Remenyi

Download PDF (free)

Faculty Perceptions of Business Communication Skills and Needs of Management Students  pp297‑312

Shailja Agarwal, Jaya Chintranshi

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Knowledge Sharing in Academic Institutions: a Study of Multimedia University Malaysia  pp313‑324

Ming-YuCheng

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Organisational Knowledge Base and Knowledge Transfer in the Shipping Industry  pp325‑340

Jiangang Fei, Solomon Chen, Shu-Ling Chen

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Leveraging Knowledge Understanding in Documents  pp341‑352

Moria Levy

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Knowledge Management Model for Information Technology Support Service  pp353‑367

Maria Mvungiand Ian Jay

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Situated, Embodied Human Interaction and its Implications for Context Building in Knowledge Mobilisation Design  pp368‑377

Erkki Patokorpi

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Power, Discursive Practices and the Construction of the "Real"  pp378‑387

Alketa Peci, Marcelo Vieira

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Abstract

Starting with a critique of the epistemological and ontological bases of neo‑institutionalism, in this article we defend the potential for the application of post‑structuralist perspectives to the institutional approach. We contend that this theoretical approach, which incorporates an element, traditionally overlooked in institutional analyses, namely power, has the advantage of contributing to an enhanced comprehension of the dynamics of institutionalization. We apply post‑structural perspectives, particularly as presented by Michel Foucault, as well as the pragmatic perspectives represented by the works of William James and Richard Rorty, to explicating underpinnings of the institutional approach. We would stress that the affinity between the post‑structural perspective and pragmatism has been acknowledged by other authors, such as Keller (1995), McSwite (1997) and Rorty (1999) himself. Incorporating the element of power into the analysis contributes to an enhanced comprehension of the dynamics of institutionalization. In conclusion, we believe that the area of organizational studies would benefit by a more all‑encompassing vision of the processes of institutionalization, which would include power at its core, instead of considering institutions as non‑changing variables. Clegg (1989) has provided a framework for such analysis and this paper serves to elaborate what some of its philosophical foundations might be in greater detail. We would stress that it is not possible to find answers if we just search for cause‑effect relations, because the explanations found through causal mechanisms constitutes, in itself, a kind of discourse of power, as pointed out by moderns such as Hobbes (1650). Undoubtedly, if we take empirical research into consideration, what we need is, from a historical perspective, understand the way by which the main discourses or narratives constitute, transform and are transformed by our objects of investigation, among which organizations certainly occupy a central place. However, it is necessary to tackle this undertaking with a certain degree of humility, abandoning the search for ultimate causes to more proximate and local narratives, small stories that communicate their own sense of the mechanisms of truth at work. And in these matters, we should be bullied into causality. 

 

Keywords: power, discursive practices, institutionalization, post-structuralism, fields, construction of the "real"

 

Share |
Pluralism in Knowledge Management: a Review  pp388‑397

James Sheffield

Look inside Download PDF (free)