The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management aims to publish perspectives on topics relevant to the study, implementation and management of knowledge management
Click here to see other Scholarly Electronic Journals published by API
For a range of research text books on this and complimentary topics visit the Academic Bookshop

Information about the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM) is available here.

For info on the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM), click here
Information about the European Conference on Intellectual Capital (ECIC) is available here
To join the EJKM review committee click here
 
Journal Issue
Volume 7 Issue 5 / Dec 2009  pp535‑662

Editor: Kimiz Dalkir

Download PDF (free)

Design of Sustainable Development: Intellectual Value of Large BRIC Companies and Factors of their Growth  pp535‑558

Elvina Bayburina, Tatiana Golovko

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Intellectual Capital in Tech Industries: a Longitudinal Study  pp559‑566

Scott Erickson, Helen Rothberg

Look inside Download PDF (free)

What is the Value of Knowledge Management Practices?  pp567‑574

Fahmi Ibrahim, Vivien Reid

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Intellectual Capital Disclosures: the Search for a new Paradigm in Financial Reporting by the Knowledge Sector of Indian Economy  pp575‑582

Mahesh Joshi, Dharminder Singh Ubha

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Evaluating Knowledge Management Performance  pp583‑592

Clemente Minonneand Geoff Turner

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Knowledge Management Implementation: a Process Design Proposition at Brazil's ONS (National Operator of the Interconnected Power System)  pp593‑604

Rivadávia Correa Drummond de Alvarenga Neto, Renato Rocha Souza, Jairo Gomes Queiroz, Hermes Chipp

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Let's Learn Unlearning: How Top Managers Conceive and Implement Knowledge Active Forgetting  pp605‑614

Mehdi Bagherzadeh Niri, Mohammad Hosein Rezazade Mehrizi

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Perceptions on Complexity of Decisions Involved in Choosing Intellectual Capital Assessment Methods  pp615‑626

Agnieta Pretorius, Petrie Coetzee

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Knowledge Management Discipline: Test for an Undergraduate Program in Turkey  pp627‑636

Mustafa Sagsan

Look inside Download PDF (free)

An Experimental Comparison of 3D Virtual Environments and Text Chat as Collaboration Tools  pp637‑646

Andreas Schmeil, Martin Eppler, Mattia Gubler

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Activities and Outputs of a Clinical Faculty: an Intellectual Capital Concept Map  pp647‑662

Belinda Wilkinson, Clare Beghtol, Dante Morra

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Abstract

The concept of intellectual capital (IC) was used to evaluate the activities and outputs of a university medical department. First, a conceptual framework was developed to highlight the importance of various activities as dimensions of IC. The conceptualization of IC was further developed using concept mapping (CM). The authors first considered the problem of what comprises IC and determined whether previous researchers have defined IC in terms of activities. The importance of IC, its definition as an organizational resource and activity, the link between IC and value creation and extraction activities, and the problem of the associated composition of IC taken from existing European guidelines and regulations were discussed. To begin to construct a classification of activities and outputs, the information currently employed for assessing the research, education, and related academic activities and outputs of faculty members were analyzed. Four different evaluation approaches were compared to identify the activities and outputs of a university medical department, and to consolidate the information being collected for evaluation of universities, university‑affiliated research institutes, researchers within universities, and faculty within university departments into an inclusive set of activities and outputs. These were two forms of IC reporting, one used in Austrian universities and the other at a university‑affiliated Swedish research institute together with two other long‑established means of assessing faculty, the Research Assessment Exercise in the UK, and the faculty evaluation and promotion requirements at the University of Toronto in Canada. Education administrators' perceptions were solicited to derive the IC used in a research faculty of a Canadian university. The results indicate that IC can be understood in terms of both activities and outputs. Clinical faculty can be expected to engage in research and its supervision, education, obtaining qualifications, clinical and professional practice, and service. Within these categories, individual activities and outputs were not considered to be of equal importance or impact. Among seventy activities and outputs, articles in internationally refereed journals was ranked as most important, whereas teaching awards was ranked as having the most impact by the most participants. This study extends existing research by using CM to generate a conceptual framework of IC for a department of medicine. 

 

Keywords: intellectual capital, guidelines, concept mapping, university medical department, clinical faculty, education administrators

 

Share |